When manipulating an imaje you have to make sure you don't offend anyone by it or use copyrighted picture without soucing or permission. The article described ethical as"If something is “ethical” by definition it is “conforming to professional standards of conduct”"
Some main points are:
Big newspapers like Washinton Post and New York Times have strict guidelines on how to shoot and edit their photographs. I think people should only manipulate the picture to make them look better as in changing the lighting and remove things that should not be in the picture. If you are going to alter somebody's body or face you shouldas for permission first, and if you are going to add someone's face to a preexisting picture you should credit the proper sources.
- Who’s in charge?
- Who manages the release of photos?
- And what happens when no one is in charge?
- How do you police, prevent, or hold people accountable for doing this? And should we?
- What about the internet?
Big newspapers like Washinton Post and New York Times have strict guidelines on how to shoot and edit their photographs. I think people should only manipulate the picture to make them look better as in changing the lighting and remove things that should not be in the picture. If you are going to alter somebody's body or face you shouldas for permission first, and if you are going to add someone's face to a preexisting picture you should credit the proper sources.
Comments
Post a Comment